Classic quote

We received a call in from a client recent after winning her case who was responding to a message left at her home. During the call we shared the good news about the win, the full breakdown of what was won etc.

When she was told of the amount she replied “Oh no, thats not correct!”.

“Yes, madam” She was told. “We have checked the amount and it includes the amount your paid, plus interest”.

But she insisted that it was wrong and that it should be more. “How, is that so?” we asked.

“That loan cost me my second marriage” came her reply.

Fantastic!

Was my PPI mis-sold? 1 of 5

Do you know the answer ?

Don’t worry, most people don’t.

To try and help I will be writing a series of short articles over the next few weeks to try and explain some of the rules and principles that a bank, insurer or broker should follow when selling insurance,  including payment protection insurance (or PPI).

A little background

First, its important to understand that financial services companies are regulated by the Financial Services Authority (FSA). The FSA has a series of objectives and one of which is to protect the consumer and ensure that they receive the right kind of products.

Financial Services Authority control PPI mis-selling

PPI MIs-selling rules by FSA

The FSA “grant” permissions to firms (firms = banks & other sellers/ providers of financial products) to sell financial products so long as they follow certain rules. These rules are contained in a set of rulebooks  (“The Handbook”).  In addition, the FSA has a series of Principles which form the basis from which all rules are written. Even if a rule doesn’t exist, firms must take note of Principals when they do business and keep within the spirit of these as well as the rules.

PPI Rules and Key dates

PPI as a product came under regulation on 14th January 2005. After this date, all sales of the product were required to follow the rules set our by the FSA.

Sales before this date were not covered by the FSA directly. However, banks and other major financial institutions already had codes of conduct from the General Insurance Standards Council (GISC) which were very close to the rules the FSA introduced anyway.

However, some companies who sold PPI before 14/1/2005 did so without any rules in place at all. Hence, a key fact in deciding if your PPI was mis-sold is a) who sold the insurance to you, and b) what date did the sale complete (i.e. before or after 14/1/2005) ?

In summary, there are lots of rules in place to protect consumers who buy financial services products. The specific rules depend on what products are bought, who sold them and when they were sold.

Further, next time we will look at what the rules state a seller must do before going on to discuss soem common failings of firms.

 

 

 

Website developments…bare with us

We are undertaking some work on our website and so we apologise in advance if things look… a bit odd… for a few days. Its all part if improving the quality of information and part of a range of new things including:-

- refer a friend scheme. Refer Crystal Legal Services to your friends, family, work colleagues and neighbours. If they go on to use our services we’ll pay you a thank you of £50. Simple

- easier ways to spread the word. Facebook and Twitter integration coming very soon

- improved news about how we can help you recover even more money from mis-selling

- ability to start your claim online

- see the progress of your claim and get real time updates as your case develops

 

Check back soon or send us an email to info@crystallegal.com and we’ll keep you updated automatically

Thanks again

Tony Shields

Brilliant news for Barclays PPI Complaints

In a recent press announcement Barclays have confirmed that for those customers who’s complaints were affected by the recent court action will have their complaints upheld.

For complaints lodged before October 2010 (which were affected by the court action) Barclays confirm that they will not challenge any of the complaints.

Where clients genuinely have PPI on their loans and cartedit cards, Barclays will not fight these cases. Instead, they are making a gesture of good will equivalent to the expected amount the client would received if in fact the cmplaint had been upheld (i.e. it looks and smells like a win but they call it something different….!)

Well done Barclays, lets see the other banks falling into line.

Due to the volume of complaints under investigation by banks it may take some time to completely clear the back log.

Payment Protection Insurance: BBA Lose case, FSA & Consumer Win

Stop press: The Judge presiding over the long-running BBA PPI legal dispute has today passed down his decision.

The banks have lost their legal battle to prevent the FSA introducing the changes of their August 2010 directive.

Unfortunately, the banks have been given 21 days to appeal and at this point we do not know a) whether they will lodge an appeal, or b) the impact on cases on hold if they do.

See letters from Bank of Scotland & Lloyds on this matter here:Bank of Scotland BBA Update 110426 and here: Lloyds BBA update 110426

We wil issue a further update in due course as soon as we have more information.

Crystal Legal Services Ltd

URGENT UPDATE : Decision on BBA expected soon

At long last. We have heard that the outcome of the Judicial Review is expected soon. Lots of industry speculation exists on what the judge will say but everybody (except the banks) are hoping for a positive outcome for consumers.
We fully expect this to be high profile outcome but will update you all as soon as we have some news…

Cheers
Tony

Why use a Claims Management Company (CMC) for a PPI complaint?

This is a question we are often asked by people looking for help. The answer depends on what you want?

Whenever we take on a new client our process requires that we explain to that client that they are able to do this (the claim) themselves if they want. They just need to have the time, knowledge and commitment to see the complaint through.

That’s right! There is no “Black Magic” or “Trickery” in what we do for clients. We just follow processes with applied knowledge.

There are 3 major advantages we have;

First, as a business what we do is apply the rules (in this case the FSA Handbook) to the particular specifics of your case and complain to the broker/ lender/ bank etc on our behalf. Most often (we feel) is that they appreciate we understand the rules and therefore can quickly spot if they offer choose to respond in the right way. Using our experience and knowledge we then reply, quoting relevant rules and regulations, and highlighting the differences as we see it. Mostly, this results in won cases. (perhaps these people are less likely to try to fob us off?)

Second, we have the benefit of technology. We have automated process that help us and computer systems to generate letters; to prompt us when responses are overduedue; and to ensure that we keep within the strict complaint time scales allowed.

Finally, hassle-factor. We won’t get fed up. We don’t have the problem of writing letters when getting home after a stressful day and putting the little-ones to bed when you’d rather have a glass of wine than get into an row with your bank. That’s our job..

The point being is, any consumer can do what we do. If you understand the FSA Handbook and are organised and happy to take on the banks or brokers and some of their trickery you should have similar results to us. The problem comes when you are presented by a technical argument or a rejection with reasons. What do you do then? Unfortunately, no claims company in the land is likely to help at that stage and you have a challenge….

So yes, we claims companies charge a fee. How else could we do what we do? We tell you up-front how much and the good ones wait till we have won you some money and you’ve been paid before sending an invoice- others charge up front :-(    [be careful]

All we ask is that you pay us when we’re successful because otherwise we may have to try and get money from you rather then the bank….. ;-)

Remember that we’re regulated by the MOJ [Ministry of Justice - CRM20182] should you need to complain andso you should be able to take the uncertainty out of the process if nothing else.

But, if you feel confident, up-for-a-fight and can be organised then you might want to give it a go! Just remember that the clock is ticking from the day you first complain…..

If unsure you can call us on 01270 446600 and we’ll help wherever we can.

Why not subscribe and receive news and views that could help you get money you deserve….

Hang on, we’re still winning PPI mis-selling cases……

We're winning PPI claims


Within all of the updates about cases on hold I thought I would remind everybody that we are still winning cases. This week alone we’ve had wins for clients with Lloyds TSB, Tesco Finance, Capital One, Renault Financial Services and Santander. Crystal Legal Services has successfully recovered money for clients and they have received full refund of premiums, plus interest plus compensation for their mis-sold payment protection insurance.

Its certainly not too late to claim and not all claims are on hold. If you have insurance on any finance taken in the last 10 years we can help get this money back for you.

Call us on 01270 446600 and start your claim without risk on a no-win no fee basis with no upfront costs at all.

PPI BBA General Update

Unfortunately there is not a lot to update you with.

As yet there is no decision from the Judicial Review (JR) which took place in January. Very frustrating! Despite our efforts banks taking part in the BBA JR are still putting claims on hold and not progressing a section of claims which they feel are affected. We are hoping to have some news from the JR soon.

We are still opening new complaints so if you find more agreements then please let us know. And don’t forget about our referral scheme for your friends and family either.

 

Letter from the Ombudsman (FOS) about PPI complaint

We have receive a letter from FOS with an update about complaints referred to them. You can read the letter by clicking here FOS Update on BBA Document.

As you can see, the BBA judicial review has resulted in thousands of complaints being passed to FOS with an estimated lead time of a whole year!!

We are waiting to see the impending outcome of Judicial Review before deciding what to do next. As ever, if you have a complaint with us currently on hold because of the BBA Judicial Review we’ll be in touch as soon as we have some more news.